The need to use this rather suspect form of logical argumentation becomes even more questionable when one realizes that no kind of rational argument can be adequate with regard to the defense Paul must make. In effect his defense amounts to a defense of the “Spirit” which was given to the Gentile Galatians outside of the Torah. How can an irrational experience like the ecstatic reception of the divine Spirit be defended as legitimate if the means of such a defense are limited to those available in
Page 25